Harry's Unmasked: Bill's Wedding

In the Harry Potter book series, Harry Potter disguises himself as 'Cousin Barny' at Bill and Fleur's wedding, but in the film adaptation, he does not. This is likely due to time and cost constraints, as well as the fact that audiences need to see the characters to care about them. Additionally, having a different actor play Harry, even for a short time, could be distracting for viewers.

Harry was disguised as 'Cousin Barny' in the books

In the Harry Potter books, Harry was disguised as 'Cousin Barny' at Bill and Fleur's wedding. He took on the appearance of a red-haired Muggle boy from the village of Ottery St. Catchpole, thanks to Fred Weasley stealing hairs from the boy using a Summoning Charm, which were then used in the Polyjuice Potion that Harry drank.

Despite his disguise, Luna Lovegood recognised Harry immediately, saying, 'Oh, have you changed [your name] too? [...] Just your expression.' Harry was also identified by Viktor Krum, who asked about Ginny, to Harry's irritation. Harry replied that Ginny already had a 'big, jealous boyfriend'.

Harry's disguise as Cousin Barny was an important plot point, as it allowed him to blend in at the wedding and gather information. It also added a layer of suspense, as the Death Eaters were hunting for him, and the threat of their arrival hung over the festivities.

Luna recognised Harry despite the Polyjuice Potion

Luna Lovegood was the only person to recognise Harry Potter at Bill and Fleur's wedding, despite his Polyjuice disguise. In the book, Harry is disguised as 'Cousin Barny', a red-haired relative of the Weasley family, but Luna sees through this instantly. She knows Harry so well that she can recognise him from his expression, even with a different face. This moment demonstrates the depth of their friendship.

In the film adaptation of *Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1*, Harry does not disguise himself with Polyjuice Potion, and instead attends the wedding as himself.

The film wanted to show Harry's face

The film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 saw several changes from the book, one of which was Harry's decision not to disguise himself with Polyjuice Potion at Bill and Fleur's wedding. In the novel, Harry assumes the identity of 'Cousin Barny' as a security measure, but this plot point is notably absent from the film.

The film chose not to disguise Harry for several reasons. Firstly, the filmmakers may have wanted to avoid the time and cost of casting another actor to play Harry. Secondly, the audience may have found it distracting to see Harry portrayed by a different actor, even if the change was explained. Finally, the filmmakers may have wanted to avoid repeating the same narrative device too many times, as Harry and his friends had already used Polyjuice Potion to disguise themselves in previous films.

By keeping Harry's true identity intact, the film allowed viewers to see the characters they knew and cared about, without the confusion of new actors or complicated plot explanations. This decision also helped to streamline the narrative, focusing on the emotional impact of the wedding rather than the mechanics of Harry's disguise.

Ultimately, the choice to keep Harry's face visible in the film was a creative decision that balanced the need for visual recognition and narrative efficiency.

Harry's disguise was an extra precaution

Harry's disguise as Barny Weasley, a cousin of the Weasley family, was an extra precaution to ensure his safety at Bill and Fleur's wedding. The wedding took place on 1 August 1997, just a day after Harry's 17th birthday, and was a welcome break from the looming threat of Voldemort. However, the threat of Voldemort and his Death Eaters was ever-present, and Harry's disguise was a measure to protect him from detection.

In the book, Harry's use of Polyjuice Potion to transform into Barny Weasley is a crucial detail that adds to the suspense and highlights the danger he faced. It also showcases the lengths to which the Order of the Phoenix went to protect him. The disguise allowed Harry to blend in with the Weasley family and their guests, reducing the chances of him being recognised and potentially captured or attacked by Death Eaters.

The decision to include the disguise in the book but not in the movie adaptation can be attributed to several factors. From a practical standpoint, including Harry's disguise in the movie would have required additional time and special effects, especially since the actor portraying Harry, Daniel Radcliffe, would have had less screen time. Additionally, having a different actor play Harry temporarily could have been distracting for viewers.

However, it is worth noting that some fans of the book series have expressed disappointment in the movie's omission of Harry's disguise, as it added an extra layer of tension and showcased the lengths the characters went to in order to protect Harry.

Ultimately, Harry's disguise as Barny Weasley was an extra precaution taken to ensure his safety during a time of great danger. While it added depth to the book's narrative, its exclusion from the movie can be understood from a visual and storytelling perspective.

The film cut out Polyjuice Potion to avoid repetition

In the book, Harry uses Polyjuice Potion to disguise himself as 'Cousin Barny' at Bill and Fleur's wedding. However, in the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, Harry does not disguise himself and attends the wedding as himself.

There are several reasons why the filmmakers might have chosen to cut out the Polyjuice Potion scene. Firstly, it would have required time and money for special effects, and the scene was not crucial to the plot. Secondly, having a different actor play Harry may have been distracting for viewers, and it might have felt repetitive as a similar trick had been used in previous films.

In the book, Luna Lovegood sees through Harry's disguise because she knows him so well. This small moment demonstrates the depth of their friendship. However, in the film, Luna does not recognise Harry, and this interaction is lost.

Frequently asked questions