Should R. Kelly's Music Be Played At Wedding Receptions?

R. Kelly's music has been blacklisted by many couples, DJs, and cover bands at wedding receptions. The R&B artist, who has been convicted of child abuse, has been the subject of documentaries detailing his decades-long history of sexual abuse and exploitation of women and girls. While some people question whether one can separate the artist from their art, most DJs refuse to play R. Kelly's music, especially at weddings, unless specifically requested by the bride or groom.

R. Kelly's music is controversial at wedding receptions due to his criminal charges

In the wake of the #MeToo movement, couples, DJs, and cover bands are navigating difficult conversations about whether to play his music at weddings. While some argue that justice has been served and that listening to his music does not equate to supporting his actions, others find his songs triggering and inappropriate for celebratory occasions.

Some DJs refuse to play R. Kelly's music altogether, citing ethical concerns and a desire to stand against abusive entertainers. Others leave the decision to the couple, asking them to provide a list of songs or artists they do not want to be played at their wedding.

The controversy surrounding R. Kelly's music has led to a decrease in his popularity at weddings. His songs are no longer considered classics or must-plays, with couples opting for other artists to set the celebratory mood on their special day.

The debate surrounding R. Kelly's music at weddings reflects a broader societal discussion about separating art from the artist. With similar conversations arising around other controversial figures in the entertainment industry, it remains to be seen whether R. Kelly's music will continue to face backlash or gradually make its way back into wedding playlists.

Couples, DJs and bands are banning his music

Couples, DJs, and cover bands are banning R. Kelly's music from their wedding receptions. This comes in the wake of the Surviving R. Kelly documentary, which brought new attention to the years-old sexual abuse allegations against the singer.

R. Kelly has faced numerous accusations of sexual misconduct over two decades, with many stories alleging he preyed on teenage girls. While he has never been convicted and denies any wrongdoing, the documentary has led to a renewed focus on the "Mute R Kelly" campaign, which calls for a boycott of his music and concerts.

As a result, R. Kelly's music is now considered a "no-go" at wedding receptions, with couples and DJs refusing to play his songs. Chris Keenan, a Fort Washington-based DJ and owner of Futurescapes Entertainment, stated that "R. Kelly is a one hundred percent no-go at all gigs now." Other DJs have echoed this sentiment, with many saying they will not play R. Kelly's music as they used to, especially if it isn't requested.

The situation with R. Kelly's music has also sparked conversations about whether art can be separated from the artist. Couples planning their wedding receptions are now considering the impact of playing music by artists facing allegations or convictions of sexual misconduct. This includes Michael Jackson, who has also been accused of sexual abuse, although the reaction to his music has been more complicated due to his influence and the number of his hit songs.

While some couples and DJs are choosing to ban R. Kelly's music entirely, others are navigating these decisions on a case-by-case basis. Some DJs will play R. Kelly's music if specifically requested by the bride or groom, while others prefer to avoid it altogether to prevent negative associations with the wedding day.

The decision to ban R. Kelly's music from wedding receptions reflects a broader cultural shift towards holding artists accountable for their actions and considering the impact of their music on survivors of sexual violence.

DJs are refusing to play his songs

In the wake of the Surviving R. Kelly documentary, which brought new attention to the decades-old claims of sexual abuse against the R&B singer, many DJs are refusing to play his songs at weddings and other events.

Chris Keenan, a Fort Washington-based DJ and owner of Futurescapes Entertainment, said, "R. Kelly is a one hundred percent no-go at all gigs now." He and his colleagues ask clients about their preferences regarding Kelly's music, and Keenan estimated that about 10% don't want it played due to the controversy.

In interviews, several other DJs shared similar sentiments. Most DJs, especially at weddings, are now reluctant to play R. Kelly's music unless it is specifically requested by the couple. The singer is facing criminal charges in two states and has been accused of sexually abusing and exploiting women and girls over decades.

Some DJs, like Kenan Juska, have stopped playing R. Kelly's music altogether and have no problem explaining their decision to anyone who asks. Juska draws a comparison to other problematic artists, such as Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis, and Phil Spector, whose music he also no longer plays.

Mick Batyske, also known as DJ MICK, who played Miguel's wedding and regularly DJs events for luxury clients, stated that while he wasn't a fan of R. Kelly's music to begin with, he now chooses "morals over money." He expressed that he would try to talk clients down if they insisted on having R. Kelly's songs played at their events.

Lindsey Caldwell, a.k.a. DJ Lindsey, who has DJed for Prince and at numerous weddings, takes a slightly different approach. She always discusses a "do not play" list with couples before weddings and has noticed that more and more people are adding R. Kelly to this list. However, if a couple specifically requests his music, she will play it reluctantly, explaining that she already owns the songs and isn't actively sending him money by playing them.

While public perception has largely turned against the singer, and many DJs are choosing not to play his music, the impact on their careers seems minimal.

R. Kelly's music is being blacklisted

R. Kelly's music is being boycotted by many people following the release of the documentary "Surviving R. Kelly", which detailed allegations of sexual abuse against the singer. While Kelly has denied any wrongdoing and was acquitted of child pornography charges in 2008, the documentary has brought new attention to the claims made against him. As a result, his music has been blacklisted by many individuals and organisations, who argue that it is wrong to provide a platform and revenue stream to a convicted serial sexual predator.

The Impact on the Music Industry

The movement to boycott R. Kelly's music has had a significant impact on the music industry. Spotify, the largest music streaming service in the US, removed Kelly's music from its official playlists in 2018 and continues to refrain from promoting his music. Other streaming services, such as Apple Music, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music, have also faced pressure to remove Kelly's music from their platforms but have not yet done so. The boycott has also extended to DJs and radio stations, with many refusing to play Kelly's music at weddings, parties, and on their shows.

The Debate

The boycott of R. Kelly's music has sparked a debate about whether an artist can be separated from their art. Some people argue that it is wrong to support an artist who has engaged in abhorrent behaviour, while others believe that the art should be appreciated separately from the artist. There is also a discussion about whether it is appropriate to boycott an artist who has not been convicted of a crime, as Kelly was acquitted of the charges brought against him in 2008.

The Way Forward

The movement to boycott R. Kelly's music has gained momentum and support from prominent figures and organisations. It remains to be seen whether the boycott will have a lasting impact on Kelly's career and whether streaming services and radio stations will permanently blacklist his music. In the meantime, those who wish to listen to R. Kelly's music can still access it on streaming platforms and through other means, but they may have to actively search for it rather than stumble across it on playlists or radio stations.

Some couples are still playing his music at weddings

Despite the controversy surrounding R. Kelly, some couples are still choosing to play his music at their wedding receptions. While public opinion on the singer has soured due to the sexual abuse allegations against him, there are those who continue to enjoy his music and include it in their celebrations.

In a Reddit thread, a user shared their experience as a DJ and the challenges they face when navigating requests for R. Kelly's songs. The user expressed discomfort with playing the singer's music due to the allegations, but noted that some couples still requested it, particularly his popular song "Ignition." The user ultimately decided to include it in their set, sparking a debate among other users. Some supported the decision, arguing that justice has been served with R. Kelly's conviction, while others disagreed, citing the need to support survivors of sexual violence and avoid triggering guests.

Another user shared a similar dilemma, questioning how to politely decline requests for R. Kelly's music at weddings. Suggestions included adding a clause in the contract specifying that requests are not guaranteed to be fulfilled and providing a list of "no-play" songs upfront to manage client expectations. This transparency ensures clients are aware of the DJ's boundaries and can make an informed decision when hiring.

While some couples opt for a complete ban on R. Kelly's music at their weddings, others seem to be more lenient. A couple shared their experience, explaining that while they initially debated playing "Ignition" at their wedding, they ultimately decided to include it due to its significance within their friend group. They justified their decision by stating that justice had been served with R. Kelly's conviction and that listening to his music did not equate to supporting his actions.

The decision to play R. Kelly's music at weddings remains divisive, reflecting the broader societal debate surrounding the separation of art from the artist. While some individuals choose to boycott his music entirely, others continue to enjoy it, creating a complex landscape for DJs and couples navigating wedding entertainment.

Frequently asked questions