Hosted Bar: Understanding The Beverage Service At Your Wedding

Planning a wedding can be a daunting task, and one of the most important aspects is figuring out the bar situation. A hosted bar is when the couple covers all the bar expenses, allowing guests to enjoy drinks and refills without worrying about their budget. This option often leads to happier guests and shorter lines, as bartenders only focus on serving drinks. However, it can be expensive, especially if guests overindulge. On the other hand, a no-host bar or cash bar is when guests pay for their drinks, which can save costs but may be seen as tacky and lead to longer lines. Ultimately, the choice depends on budget constraints and guest preferences, with options like limited or subsidised bars also available to suit different needs.

The difference between a hosted bar and an open bar

When it comes to weddings, there are a few different ways to configure your bar service. The two most commonly confused terms are "hosted bar" and "open bar".

Hosted Bar

A hosted bar means the couple covers all the bar expenses, allowing guests to enjoy alcoholic drinks and refills without worrying about their budget. The pros of a hosted bar are that guests will be happy and there will be no long lines as bartenders will only be serving drinks, not handling transactions. However, the cost of a hosted bar is the primary deal-breaker for many couples. It can be expensive and may result in a surprisingly large bill, especially if guests overindulge and possibly cause disruptions.

Open Bar

An open bar is similar to a hosted bar in that the couple pays for all the drinks. However, the difference lies in how the couple is charged. Instead of paying for individual drinks, they pay an hourly fee for each guest, regardless of the amount of alcohol consumed. The pros of an open bar are that it creates a fun, party atmosphere and guests don't have to worry about their budget. On the other hand, some guests might overindulge, leading to disruptions, and people are sometimes wasteful, forgetting about their drinks and ordering more.

The choice between a hosted bar and an open bar depends on your budget, your guests, and the type of wedding you want. A hosted bar may be a good option if your guests are not expected to drink much, as you only pay for what they order. An open bar, on the other hand, may be more cost-effective if you have many guests who are big drinkers, as you pay a fixed hourly fee. It's important to consider your guest list, the type of event, your budget, and the potential for overindulgence when deciding between a hosted bar and an open bar.

The pros and cons of a hosted bar

A hosted bar is where the couple covers all the bar expenses, allowing guests to enjoy drinks and refills without worrying about their budget.

Pros of a hosted bar

• Guests will be thrilled about the free drinks.
• Bartenders will only focus on serving drinks, avoiding long lines as they won't have to process transactions.
• A hosted bar can help create a fun, party atmosphere with guests dancing and mingling.

Cons of a hosted bar

• It can be expensive, with bar services and beverages costing on average over $2,000.
• Some guests might overindulge, leading to possible mishaps and regrets.
• People are sometimes wasteful when they're not paying for drinks, leaving drinks unfinished and ordering more.

The pros and cons of a no-host bar

A no-host bar, also known as a cash bar, is where guests pay for their alcoholic drinks. It is an option for couples who want to serve alcohol at their wedding but are on a tight budget. While it may be a practical choice for some, others may find it tacky and unacceptable.

Pros of a No-Host Bar:

• Significant savings: The most significant advantage of a no-host bar is the money you'll save. With this option, you won't have to worry about covering the cost of your guests' drinks, allowing you to allocate your budget to other essential wedding items or splurge on extras like desserts or entertainment.
• Reduced over-indulgence: A no-host bar may discourage guests from over-indulging, as they will need to pay for each drink. This can help prevent drunken mishaps and the potential social and legal issues that may arise from guests becoming intoxicated.
• Flexibility for guests: A no-host bar allows guests to choose their drinks without feeling limited by the host's budget.

Cons of a No-Host Bar:

• Potential for long lines: With a no-host bar, bartenders will need to process cash and credit card transactions, which can slow down service and result in long lines.
• Perceived as tacky: Some guests may find a no-host bar unacceptable and contrary to the tenets of hospitality, especially if they are expecting complimentary drinks.
• Impact on atmosphere: A no-host bar may deter guests from fully letting loose on the dance floor and could result in an early exodus if guests choose not to pay for drinks.

Middle Ground Options:

If you're concerned about the potential drawbacks of a no-host bar, there are some middle ground options to consider:

• Limited bar: As the host, you pay for a limited selection of drinks, such as wine, beer, and/or signature cocktails. This allows you to treat your guests without breaking the bank.
• Subsidized bar: You partly pay for drinks, and guests cover the remaining cost. For example, you can offer a few free drinks or cover drinks for a set time, and then switch to a no-host bar.
• Ticket system: Provide guests with a set number of drink tickets for free drinks, after which they will need to pay.

Ultimately, the decision to have a no-host bar depends on your budget, the type of event you want to host, and the expectations of your guests.

What is a limited bar?

A limited bar is a great option for couples who want to serve alcohol at their wedding but don't want to pay for a full range of drinks. It is a middle ground between an open bar and a cash bar, offering a limited selection of drinks such as beer, wine, and a few non-alcoholic options. This option tends to be cheaper, as spirits are not included.

Couples who opt for a limited bar can choose to make it an open bar or a cash bar, or a combination of both. For example, they may choose to foot the bill for beer and wine, and offer a cash bar for mixed drinks. This flexibility allows couples to manage their budget while still providing a variety of drink options for their guests.

When it comes to informing guests about the limited bar, opinions vary. Some believe that it is not necessary to mention it on the wedding invitations, especially if alcohol is served for free. Others suggest including a brief note on a ''details' card or the wedding website, such as "Limited bar available" or "We'll bring the beer and wine, you bring the party." Ultimately, it is the couple's decision, and they can choose to share as much or as little information as they want.

A limited bar can be a great way to keep costs down while still offering guests a selection of drinks to enjoy. It allows couples to customise their wedding bar to fit their budget and preferences.

What is a subsidised bar?

A subsidised bar is one where the hosts pay a set amount towards each drink, with the guests paying the difference. This is a way to reduce the overall cost of the bar tab for the hosts, while still providing drinks for guests.

In a thread on The Knot, one user suggests that they would like to have an open bar at their wedding, but that it is not within their budget. They are shocked at how much venues charge per drink and are concerned that their guests will be shocked at the drink prices. They ask if it is possible to subsidise the price of drinks, for example, by paying the venue $2 or $3 for each drink sold, with the guests paying the difference. This would bring the drink cost down to a more manageable amount.

Another user on the same thread suggests that instead of subsidising the bar, the couple should either have an open bar with only beer and wine, or a dry wedding. They state that it is never okay to ask guests to pay any price for what the couple should be hosting. Other users agree, stating that cash bars are 'horribly rude' and that the couple should put the money they are trying to put toward the bar toward beer and wine instead.

However, one user points out that cash bars are common where they are from and are in no way considered rude. They state that they have been to dozens of weddings and only one has had a free bar. They suggest that if the couple can subsidise the bar, it would be appreciated but not expected.

Another user on the thread agrees, stating that they are from St. John's Newfoundland, and that cash bars are the norm there. They go on to explain that a typical wedding reception in that area lasts a minimum of 12 hours, and that no one expects the couple to foot the bill for their guests' drinking for the entire night.

In response to this, another user points out that cash bars are not necessarily a regional thing anymore and that the couple should look into venues where they can afford to host the bar.

So, while some people believe that a subsidised bar is better than a cash bar, as guests will be expecting a hosted bar, others believe that any kind of cash bar is unacceptable, regardless of whether the couple can afford to host the bar or not.

Frequently asked questions