Meagan's Wedding Dress: A Review

what did people think of meagan wedding dress

Meghan Markle's wedding dress has been a topic of discussion since her marriage to Prince Harry in 2018. The dress, designed by Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy, was described as beautiful and classic by some, while others found it boring and off-the-rack. There were also speculations about Meghan's fashion choices, with some believing she would incorporate modern bridal trends or fashion-forward elements. The dress was said to be symbolic, with a veil embroidered with flowers representing the countries of the Commonwealth. With approximately two billion viewers worldwide, the wedding sparked debates about Meghan's dress and hair choices, with some criticising her for not fitting the typical princess mould.

Characteristics Values
Design House Givenchy
Designer Clare Waight Keller
Style Classic, simple, elegant, off-the-rack
Symbolism Veil embroidered with flowers representing the countries of the Commonwealth
Public Opinion "Beautiful", "Boring", "Like a handmaiden"
Fitting Poor fit due to last-minute changes

shunbridal

Meghan Markle's wedding dress was designed by Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy

The dress was designed with a careful selection of fabric and shape, and the veil was embroidered with the flowers of all 53 countries in the Commonwealth. Markle worked closely with the designer to create a gown that reflected her personal style and humanitarian efforts. It was a deliberate choice to diverge from the elaborate gowns of royal weddings past, and it is reported that she spent months working on the design.

The dress sparked a debate on social media, with some people comparing it to something off-the-rack or handmaiden. However, others defended the dress, saying that it was classic and elegant, and that it is a powerful statement of simplicity. The dress has been described as "absolute perfection" and a perfect balance of elegance, fun, and sophistication, reflecting the personality of the Duchess of Sussex.

The choice of designer was also significant. Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy created a gown that evoked old Hollywood glamour, reminiscent of Audrey Hepburn. The brand is famous for its Hollywood associations, and the dress reflected Markle's fashion-forward nature and modern bridal trends. The dress was also said to be similar to gowns from the 1950s, invoking a classic and timeless style.

Overall, the dress designed by Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy was a thoughtful and purposeful choice by Meghan Markle, reflecting her personality and values. While it divided opinions, it ultimately became a memorable part of her wedding to Prince Harry, with approximately two billion people worldwide tuning in to witness the celebration.

shunbridal

The dress was simple, structural, and made of double-bonded silk cady

Meghan Markle's wedding dress was a subject of much discussion and commentary, with various opinions expressed about its design, simplicity, and symbolism. The dress, designed by Givenchy, was described by some as "beautiful" and "classic," while others found it "boring" and "off-the-rack."

The choice of silk cady as the fabric added a luxurious and refined touch to the overall design. Silk cady is known for its smooth, lustrous surface and a slight heft that gives the fabric beautiful drape and flow. The double-bonded construction of the silk cady used in Meghan's dress likely provided a slightly heavier weight and an elegant, fluid drape, perfect for a wedding gown.

The simple and structural design of the dress, combined with the luxurious fabric, created a timeless and sophisticated look. The dress's silhouette and fabric choice flattered Meghan's figure and, as one commentator noted, took a beautiful woman to make a dress that simple look that good. The dress's simplicity also allowed Meghan's personality and presence to shine through, sending a powerful message without uttering a word.

The dress's design and fabric choice also carried symbolic meaning. The sleek and modern silhouette, free from excessive ornamentation, reflected Meghan's own sense of style and her willingness to forge her own path within the royal family. The choice of silk cady, a luxurious and refined fabric, added a subtle touch of glamour and elegance, reflecting the importance and grandeur of the occasion.

shunbridal

The dress was compared to Audrey Hepburn's dress in the film Funny Face

The wedding dress chosen by Meghan Markle for her marriage to Prince Harry in May 2018 was designed by British designer Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy. The dress was simple and classic in style, and it divided opinion among those who saw it. Some people thought it was "off-the-rack", while others thought it was elegant and stunning.

The comparison to Hepburn's dress in Funny Face is particularly apt, as that dress was also a wedding gown. In the film, Hepburn's character, Jo Stockton, wears a simple, elegant white dress with a full skirt and short sleeves. The dress is worn in a famous scene in which Stockton walks down the aisle towards her groom, played by Fred Astaire.

Markle's dress also had a full skirt, creating a classic silhouette that fell to just above the bride's feet. The dress featured a double-bonded silk cady, with a soft matte lustre, and three-quarter-length sleeves. Like Hepburn's dress, it was understated and elegant, with a timeless quality.

The comparison to Hepburn's dress in Funny Face highlights the classic, elegant style that both women embodied. Markle's dress was also compared to those worn by other royal brides, including Angela Brown at her wedding to Prince Maximilian of Liechtenstein in 2000 and Mary Donaldson at her wedding to Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark, in 2004.

shunbridal

The veil was embroidered with flowers representing the countries of the Commonwealth

Meghan Markle's wedding dress was one of the most highly anticipated fashion choices of the decade. The Duchess of Sussex wore a simple and classic wedding dress designed by Givenchy. The dress was elegant, glamorous, and an act of royal rebellion.

The dress was also filled with symbolism, with Meghan wanting to send a powerful message on her wedding day. The dress was made for a person, not a princess, reflecting Meghan's strong sense of self and her desire to use her voice. It was also speculated that Meghan wanted to ensure that the dress would be comfortable and allow her to dance.

The wedding, which took place on 19 May 2018 at St. George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, was the fourth most-watched royal wedding ever, with approximately two billion people tuning in worldwide. The event was filled with symbolism, and Meghan's dress was no exception. The choice of designer and style of the dress were a departure from traditional royal weddings, reflecting Meghan's modern and fashion-forward nature.

shunbridal

Markle's reception dress was designed by Stella McCartney

Meghan Markle's wedding dress was a topic of much discussion, with some calling it "boring, ugly, and unflattering", while others praised its simplicity and elegance. The dress, designed by Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy, was a simple, structural, double-bonded silk cady haute couture gown with a bateau neckline, three-quarter sleeves, and just six seams. It was adorned with a sweeping 16-foot embroidered veil, dainty stud earrings, a diamond bracelet, and Queen Mary's 1932 tiara.

Markle's choice of a second wedding dress designed by Stella McCartney for the evening reception at Frogmore House was a stunning and sophisticated choice. The gown, made of silk crepe, was described as "gorgeous" and "a totally different vibe". It featured a high neck and was lily white in colour. The choice of McCartney as the designer was significant as she is a British designer with an American mother, similar to Markle's background. Markle paired the dress with Princess Diana's stunning aquamarine cocktail ring, adding a royal touch to her second wedding look.

The Stella McCartney gown was a halter-neck design, a departure from the high-neck style of the Givenchy dress, offering Markle a fresh and intimate look for her evening celebrations. The silk crepe fabric added a touch of sophistication and glamour, conjuring a Hollywood feel to the royal wedding reception. The choice to wear a second dress was not uncommon, as Kate Middleton also opted for a second, more streamlined dress for her reception.

The reception dress was a bespoke creation, tailored specifically for Markle, reflecting her unique style and personality. It complemented the royal wedding theme while also showcasing Markle's fashion-forward nature. The lily white colour was a symbolic choice, representing purity and elegance, and it served as a beautiful contrast to the ivory Givenchy gown she wore during the ceremony.

Overall, the Stella McCartney reception dress was a stunning and memorable choice, offering Markle a chance to showcase her personal style and cultural heritage while celebrating her wedding to Prince Harry in an intimate setting with close family and friends. The dress received positive reviews and has left an enduring impression, inspiring bridal fashion trends and solidifying Markle's influence on the fashion industry.

Frequently asked questions

Meghan Markle's wedding dress received mixed reviews. Some people thought it was beautiful and classic, while others found it boring and off-the-rack. There were also some who compared it to the gowns worn by Princess Diana and Audrey Hepburn. Overall, it seems that the dress sparked a lot of debate and discussion, with some praising its simplicity and elegance, and others finding it underwhelming.

Meghan Markle's wedding dress was designed by British fashion designer Clare Waight Keller, the artistic director of the fashion house Givenchy. Markle chose Keller for her "elegant aesthetic" and "relaxed demeanour".

Meghan Markle's wedding dress was filled with symbolism. The dress made a solid fashion statement and was said to be a reflection of Markle's personality and values. The veil, for example, was embroidered with flowers representing the countries of the Commonwealth. The dress was also seen as a powerful message to little girls who looked up to her, with some interpreting it as a statement about her right to use her voice and express herself.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment